Tribble Respond

Every RFP your team declines
is revenue already lost

Three questions. About a minute. A number you can take to your CFO.

At modeled inputs, teams like yours see about $380,000 /yr

Adjust to your numbers below

Trusted by revenue teams at

TRM Labs

200 RFPs/yr

Same team, more volume

Up from 80 — no new headcount added

Americold

$2.7M

Recovered value

Annual value recovered across 95 reps in year one

Datavant

< 30 days

Breakeven timeline

Time to breakeven after switching from Loopio

Step 1 of 3

How many RFPs does your team respond to each year?

Include RFIs, DDQs, and security questionnaires

100

Industry avg: 80–150

10500

Time savings value

$80,000/yr

You save 1,000 labor hours annually responding to RFPs 50% faster.

Nicole at TRM Labs eliminated 25–31 SME interruptions per day.

100 × 20 hrs × 50% × $80/hr

Win rate improvement

$50,000/yr

+1% win rate = 1.0 additional deal/yr from faster, higher-quality responses.

Teams losing bids to missed deadlines recover 1–5pp win rate.

100 × 1% × $50K ACV

Capacity expansion value

$250,000/yr

Pursue 20 more RFPs with reclaimed time — win 5.0 additional deals without adding headcount.

TRM Labs went from 80 to 200 RFPs/yr, same team size.

100 × 20% × 25% × $50K ACV

Your results are ready

Enter your work email to unlock the full breakdown — we can also send a one-page summary for your CFO.

Total annual ROI value

$380,000/year

Time savings

$80,000

Win rate

$50,000

Capacity

$250,000

Breakeven at Tribble’s typical cost < 30 days

How the model works

Time savings assumes 50% faster completion (research, drafting, coordination) at a loaded $80/hr.
Win rate uses +1 percentage point on RFP-originated deals from better quality and speed.
Capacity assumes you reinvest 20% of time saved into additional RFPs, at your current win rate.
Breakeven compares total modeled value to a $30K illustrative annual platform cost; your actual ROI depends on scope and contract.